The Bass diffusion model was developed by Frank Bass and describes the process how new products get adopted as an interaction between users and potential users. The model is widely used in forecasting, especially product forecasting and technology forecasting. Click here for the full description on Wikipedia.

The Xcelcius dashboard allows users to interactively vary the parameters of the diffusion model. This is useful when doing ‘what if’ analysis during product portfolio planning stage. The sales profile is more realistic and can be embedded into the interactive portfolio or we can create a Monte Carlo income statement with distributions to describe uncertainty in ultimate market potential (m), coefficient of imitation (p) and coefficient of innovation (q).

To paraphrase Napoleon, “a good interactive dashboard is worth a thousand words”! Very nice way to illustrate how the parameters of the Bass curve influence the curve.
As an aside, I was initially thrown off by the time of peak sales value. I am convinced now the number you return is correct, but it took me a bit of thinking to reconcile it with the time scale of the chart. You would expect a peak sales occurring at time, say, 7.67 (that’s what you get for parameters 0.01; 0.5), to correspond to a peak in period 7 of the chart, which is not the case. I realized after a bit that period T covered time T-1 to T, so 7.67 would actually occur in period 8…

One thing I still can’t figure out is WHAT units are defined by time. So I can make my S curve work, but is the time periods days, week, months, years, decades. Or do I also have to figure out WHEN penetration will have occurred, and back out from there. eg using the famous .03 and .38 share doesn’t go up much after time units hit 20. So if really I thought market will be saturated in five years, then I just relabel my time axis? Sorry to be so dense about this, but it seems that understanding the timing of this, is as important as the peak, and I don’t know how to get my arms around thinking about the units other than to throw out the whole equation and just consider the shape. Any thoughts here? Thanks!

See how Owlstone's FAIMS technology will be used to help save lives by detecting lung cancer earlier ow.ly/BBxls10 hours ago

BBC News - Tech firms want 'digital ministers' and easier migration ow.ly/Byezs1 day ago

RT @policynetwork: “Maybe I can actually start my own company?” @Bily_Boyle on importance of R&D funding & raising ceiling of aspiration ht… 6 days ago

RT @policynetwork: What the innovators of tomorrow see today - successful entrepreneur @Bily_Boyle on the importance of R&D investment http… 1 week ago

To paraphrase Napoleon, “a good interactive dashboard is worth a thousand words”! Very nice way to illustrate how the parameters of the Bass curve influence the curve.

As an aside, I was initially thrown off by the time of peak sales value. I am convinced now the number you return is correct, but it took me a bit of thinking to reconcile it with the time scale of the chart. You would expect a peak sales occurring at time, say, 7.67 (that’s what you get for parameters 0.01; 0.5), to correspond to a peak in period 7 of the chart, which is not the case. I realized after a bit that period T covered time T-1 to T, so 7.67 would actually occur in period 8…

[...] Diffusion Model – Posting / [...]

One thing I still can’t figure out is WHAT units are defined by time. So I can make my S curve work, but is the time periods days, week, months, years, decades. Or do I also have to figure out WHEN penetration will have occurred, and back out from there. eg using the famous .03 and .38 share doesn’t go up much after time units hit 20. So if really I thought market will be saturated in five years, then I just relabel my time axis? Sorry to be so dense about this, but it seems that understanding the timing of this, is as important as the peak, and I don’t know how to get my arms around thinking about the units other than to throw out the whole equation and just consider the shape. Any thoughts here? Thanks!

Hi, your right, the original formulation is a bit of a pain. There was a good post that rephrased the diffusion curve in terms of sensible numbers. There is a link to the interactive model here http://acasoanalytics.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/intuitive-bass-diffusionintuitive-bass-diffusion/ this has a link to the original posting and explanation by Mathias.

plz help me how can we estimate parameters(p & q) in bass diffusion model with LMS(least mean square method)